At one time or another, most of us have heard our mothers or fathers say that we have to do something we don't like because they are "the parent." We also know that, because they are...
Yesterday, a conservative panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision that sharply undermines the power of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and, more broadly, of the...
...
The story to be found in the Legislative History of the National Labor Relations Act is one of standing amidst the wreckage of an economy and a nation and, yet, creating the...
To anyone who lived through Ronald Reagan’s presidency, it’s a familiar story. It begins with a detailed description of a woman living high off the hog on welfare. Then it asserts that...
The latest federal budget by the President contains a proposal to change the adjustment for inflation of Social Security to an alternative "chained-CPI" index. As a practical matter, the...
In this paper we briefly review recent trends in employment outcomes for disadvantaged youth, focusing specifically on those who have become "disconnected" from...
In 1947, a campaign was taking shape to prove that unions had become too powerful. Detractors argued that massive post-war strikes were putting the nation’s economic and national...
The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has asked for public comments on the current practice under the Circular A-76 process of comparing the cost of work performed by Federal employees against that of contractors. In addition to assessing how to improve OFPP’s efforts to “identify the most cost-effective source”, the OFPP also seeks feedback that will help it evaluate existing policies on public-private cost comparisons and to consider new policies that can help agencies save money and achieve better results.
The OFPP asks for responses that consider how agencies may achieve further savings and drive even better results through the use of cost comparisons in appropriate circumstances. Ithe OFPP defines the process of cost comparison here as comparing the cost of a private sector contractor performing a defined task, or set of tasks, to the cost of having Federal employees perform the same task(s) where the work is suitable for performance by either sector.
Read & discuss»In this paper we briefly review recent trends in employment outcomes for disadvantaged youth, focusing specifically on those who have become "disconnected" from school and the labor market, and why these trends have occurred. We then review a range of policy prescriptions that might improve those outcomes. These policies include: 1) Efforts to enhance education and employment outcomes, both among in-school youth who are at risk of dropping out and becoming disconnected as well as out-of-school youth who have already done so; 2) Policies to increase earnings and incent more labor force participation among youth, such as expanding the eligibility of childless adults (and especially non-custodial parents) for the Earned Income Tax Credit; and 3) Specific policies to reduce barriers to employment faced by ex-offenders and non-custodial parents. We also consider policies that target the demand side of the labor market, in efforts to spur the willingness of employers to hire these young people and perhaps to improve the quality of jobs available to them.
Read & discuss»Regular changes in the methodology of measurement of "real" output indirectly leads to interpretations and policy decisions. Presentation of such series using consistent methodology would allow users and policy makers to frame their own views.
Read & discuss»At one time or another, most of us have heard our mothers or fathers say that we have to do something we don't like because they are "the parent." We also know that, because they are the parent, we have to comply with what they say.
When we grow up and leave home, that relationship changes, but, as anyone who has ever held a job knows, we must follow our employers' orders. (After all, that's why we call them "bosses.") Those of us in the private sector who are not represented by unions can be fired at our employer's will, or, as it's often put, for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason. As a result, most private-sector workers have little bargaining power.
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to create equality of bargaining power between employers and employees, because decades of experience showed that employers used their greater power to impose worse and worse working conditions for employees. The result was depressed wages and working conditions that reduced workers' purchasing power, which caused recessions and depressions and led to strikes and industrial strife. Congress observed that employers had more power than employees because employers had the legal right to organize as corporations and partnerships, while employees had no such protected right.
First published online May 15, 2013, by Truth-out.org. Reprinted with permission.
Read & discuss»Yesterday, a conservative panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision that sharply undermines the power of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and, more broadly, of the government as a whole to regulate business. The ruling marks the second time this year that the court has radically undercut the NLRB. In January, the court held that Obama’s 2012 recess appointments to the board were invalid, effectively undoing more than a year of NLRB decisions.
Now, the body often referred to as “the second most important court in the land, after the Supreme Court,” has held that the NLRB cannot require employers to post notices informing employees of their labor rights. The decision, which comes less than three weeks after lack of regulatory enforcement led to a fertilizer plant explosion in West, Texas that killed 14 and left about 200 injured, opens the door for businesses to challenge requirements that workers workers be informed of their health, safety and employment rights. [READ MORE]
Read & discuss»
Our very expensive federal retirement programs crowd out needed expenditures for poor children and youth in the areas of education and job training along with many other public investments. This crowding out will become much more severe in the next few decades, unless we are willing to reform the retirement programs and begin to limit these expenditures.
First published online March 8, 2013, in The Washington Post.
Read & discuss»