Research

In the book Wage Policy, Income Distribution, and Democratic Theory wage policy is broadly defined as a set of institutions designed to bolster the wages of the middle class. Historically these institutions assumed the form of labor policies that allowed for unionization and collective bargaining, and specific wage floors.Traditionally, wage floors assumed the form of federal and state minimum wage legislation. More recently, they have assumed the form of Living Wage ordinances at the local level, and also broader proposals for basic and/or minimum incomes. 

Many European countries have wage policies in the form of centralized wage setting institutions. In those countries, income inequality also tends to be less than the U.S. Aside from the welfare effects that a wage policy might have for the middle class, and its potential to reduce income inequality, it is also part and parcel of economic development. Because individuals earning higher wages will have increased purchasing power, they will be able to demand more goods and services, which in time may fuel investment and economic expansion.

Economic development is central because it is the basis of a broad middle class, which, in and of itself, militates against a dual distribution comprised of those at the very top and those at the very bottom. In that wage policy serves to enhance personal autonomy, reduce income inequality and foster economic development, it can be said to be consistent with the dictates of democratic theory.

 Published in London and New York by Routledge, 2011. Click here for more information on Wage Policy, Income Distribution, and Democratic Theory.

 

Read & discuss»

Regrettably, the last decade in the United States has been labeled a “lost decade” by a number of economic and social science analysts.Total nonfarm payroll employment failed to experience any net growth between 2000 and 2010, yielding a decade with the poorest job creation performance in the past 70 years. All persons under 55 years of age were less likely to be working in 2011-2012 than in 2000, with the size of declines in these employment rates being strongly connected with one’s age. Persons 55-57 years of age basically held their own while persons 58-79 were more likely to be working in 2010-2011 than in 2000. Employment has declined far more among teens (16-19) and young adults (20-24) than any other age group in the country. Job growth after the end of the Great Recession of 2007-09 still has left our teens far behind their older counterparts, having not generated even one net new job for them since the last quarter of 2009. 

In the “full employment” year of 2000, 45 per cent of the nation’s teens (16-19) were employed during an average month. By 2003, their employment/population ratio had declined to 36.8% and basically remained stagnant over the next three years while all other age groups saw an increase in their employment rates between 2003 and 2007. By 2007, the teen employment-population ratio dropped slightly below 35% and declined steadily through the Great Recession and the jobless recovery. In 2011 and 2012, only 26 per cent of the nation’s teens held any type of paid job, the lowest annual average employment rate in the history of our country in the post-World War II era.

 

Read & discuss»
May 29, 2013 By Andrew M. Sum

Blogs

Keynesianism apparently is winning converts among small business even though that sector seems to have been doing somewhat better than larger enterprises. The converts, however, are not in Congress and the only macro activism is coming from the Fed.

Read & discuss»
June 12, 2013 By Daniel J.B. Mitchell

Mitchell’s Musings 6-10-13: Remarks on Getting LERA’s Lifetime Achievement Award at the St. Louis meetings, June 8, 2013.  The uses of history are discussed.

Read & discuss»
June 8, 2013 By Daniel J.B. Mitchell

Op-Ed

In my testimony before the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training on February 26, 2013, I review issues relevant to the reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act, and I discuss some particular provisions of recently proposed reauthorization bills in the House of Representatives.

Read & discuss»
June 5, 2013 By Harry Holzer

In my testimony before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress on April 24, 2013, I review the evidence on long-term unemployment in the U.S. and discuss a range of policies to address this problem.

Read & discuss»
June 5, 2013 By Harry Holzer